Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | mortadela | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | msmayer | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | pepeteam | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Dimir Bounce | ingos | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
Esper Pixie | ouranos139 | 5-0 | 1st in MTGO Standard League #8949 |
4 Color Legends , Abzan Midrange , Abzan Pixie , Dimir Bounce , Dimir Control , Dimir Demons , Dimir Faeries , Dimir Flash , Dimir Midrange
Dreams of Steel and Oil ranks #54 out of approximately 339 cards in raw efficiency (top 16%).
Black average: 60.1%
Performance compared to other Black cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Dreams of Steel and Oil is a solid card that performs above average in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 3
Performance Efficiency: 32.45 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 1 mana, the average win rate in the format is 70.5%. Dreams of Steel and Oil has a win rate of 69.0%, making it 2.0% worse than other 1-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witch's Vanity | Enchantment — Saga | 8 | 74.2% | 2 |
Jace, the Perfected Mind | Legendary Planeswalker — Jace | 5 | 68.1% | 0 |
No More Lies | Instant | 10 | 68.0% | 2 |
Get Out | Instant | 8 | 67.9% | 2 |
Entity Tracker | Creature — Human Scout | 7 | 65.3% | 4 |
Disdainful Stroke | Instant | 7 | 65.0% | 3 |
Spell Pierce | Instant | 17 | 62.7% | 7 |
Loran of the Third Path | Legendary Creature — Human Artificer | 16 | 62.1% | 3 |
Break the Spell | Instant | 10 | 61.3% | 3 |
Breach the Multiverse | Sorcery | 6 | 61.1% | 3 |
Cards that perform better with Dreams of Steel and Oil than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The End | Instant | 4 | 5 | 81.6% | 69.4% | +12.2% |
Scavenging Ooze | Creature — Ooze | 2 | 5 | 80.8% | 69.7% | +11.1% |
Blot Out | Instant | 3 | 5 | 79.2% | 70.3% | +8.9% |
Saiba Cryptomancer | Creature — Moonfolk Ninja | 2 | 13 | 81.7% | 72.9% | +8.8% |
Get Out | Instant | 2 | 20 | 76.9% | 71.2% | +5.7% |
Floodpits Drowner | Creature — Merfolk | 2 | 30 | 74.7% | 69.6% | +5.1% |
Tranquil Frillback | Creature — Dinosaur | 3 | 11 | 71.4% | 66.4% | +5.0% |
Tishana's Tidebinder | Creature — Merfolk Wizard | 3 | 36 | 73.5% | 69.3% | +4.1% |
Mosswood Dreadknight | Creature — Human Knight // Sorcery — Adventure | 2 | 10 | 71.7% | 68.0% | +3.6% |
Cut Down | Instant | 1 | 48 | 72.3% | 69.2% | +3.1% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Esper Pixie | 369 | 23.9% | 55.7% |
Dimir Midrange | 115 | 5.6% | 42.4% |
Golgari Demons | 113 | 20.7% | 43.9% |
Golgari Midrange | 82 | 10.6% | 35.4% |
Dimir Bounce | 55 | 11.2% | 61.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.